Would you live in such conditions yourself?" Not a single discussion of Irkutsk’s "wooden blocks" (wooden houses as architecture of cultural heritage if we use the official terminology) goes without this rhetorical question. Behind this question there is an image of dilapidated charred buildings with "facilities" outside and lacking modern conveniences. That image, the desire of developers to digest the historical center and failure not only to restore all the monuments of wooden architecture but even to maintain them in a decent state are on one side of the scales. On the other side is the confidence of architects, art experts and historians in the uniqueness of Irkutsk’s wooden heritage and the opinion of a significant part of Irkutsk’s townspeople that it is these "wooden blocks" that create the city’s identity.
These scales have been wobbling for several decades, and for a long time disputes about wooden Irkutsk have seemed to be a lot of hot air. Meanwhile the situation is changing: some wooden houses burn down or are taken apart, others start a new life. Small companies rent them for their offices; they repair them to open a café or a shop, renovate them and establish workshops there. In that case you can turn the rhetorical question "Would you live in such conditions yourself?" into another question: "What are the peculiarities of life in a wooden house? Does it give any opportunities and what are the discomforts of it?"